Title

  • A Body Without a Head: Revisiting James Bryce’s The American Commonwealth on the Place of the President in the 19th Century Federal Government

Creator

Published In

Date

  • 2024

Volume

  • 2

Issue

  • 3

Bibliographic Citation

  • Noah A. Rosenblum, A Body Without a Head: Revisiting James Bryce’s The American Commonwealth on the Place of the President in the 19th Century Federal Government, 2 J. Am. Con. Hist. 575 (2024).

DOI

Abstract

  • Current debates in administrative and constitutional law have renewed interest in the history of the place of the president in the administrative state. Recently, some scholars and the Supreme Court have suggested that, under our system of government, the president enjoys (and always has enjoyed) wide ranging power to implement a policy program as the people’s privileged democratic agent. This article looks to the work of James Bryce to question whether these claims are true of the post-Civil War federal government.

    It concludes that there is strong reason to believe that they are not. The article relies on Bryce’s onetime classic, The American Common-wealth, which was praised by contemporaries for its accuracy. It shows that, according to Bryce, the post-bellum presidency was primarily important as a site of patronage distribution. But although the president was not yet a democratic policymaker, Bryce and others of his set thought that a transformed presidency could be a way to advance “responsible government.” The article thus ends by turning to the reception of Bryce’s work, to show how it set the stage for executive reform to come.

    The article reconstructs the place of the president in The American Commonwealth to argue that the democratically-legitimated, policy-making, president-as-chief-administrator was not yet extant in the 19th century. However, problems with the 19th-century federal government led reformers to begin imagining a reconstruction of the presidency along those lines. Recovering that history helps us see how, despite what some scholars and the Supreme Court have argued, our presidentialism is not timeless, nor mandated by the Constitution. Rather, it developed in response to particular problems and pressures—a process Bryce’s work helped catalyze.

Collections