In "If Roe Were Overruled: Abortion and the Constitution in a Post-Roe World,"' Professor Fallon has presented us with a series of knotty legal problems that could conceivably arise if Roe v. Wade were overturned. Assigned the task of responding to this piece, I feel a little frustrated by the constraint imposed by the structure of his Article, which lays out a wide array of hypothetical legal issues. Instead of using my few pages here to work at solving the problems he has raised (or marveling at their hopeless difficulty), I want to step out of his puzzle box and assess this scholarly project from the outside.
