Title

Collections

Image Title Type
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence to Hurst from Raoul Berger announcing Berger's retirement and his acknowledgement of the Hurst's impact upon his work. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Publication Reviews and Correspondence Regarding "The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States, 1780-1970" (1970) Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Janet Econome of the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly regarding Raoul Berger's book. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence to Hurst from Raoul Berger regarding Hurst's Hamilton contribution and Berger's reply to Walter Murphy in the Wisconsin Law Review. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence to Hurst from Raoul Berger regarding Berger's work on the 15th Amendment's impact on the 14th Amendment. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding the history of the fourteenth amendment. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding new publications and personal anecdotes. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence to Hurst from Raoul Berger regarding a text review. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger as well as Aida DiPace Donald of Harvard University Press concerning Hurst's review of Berger's manuscript, The Fourteenth Amendment. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding recent publications and professional accomplishments. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding constitutional law and current research. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence to Hurst from Betty Zirnite requesting Hurst's permission to use a quotation from one of his books in Raoul Berger's forthcoming book, Government by the Judiciary. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding federalism. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding recent publications and a brief personal exchange. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence to Hurst from Raoul Berger regarding text reviews. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding constitutional history. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding a recommendation for Hurst's colleague Mark Tushnet. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Raoul Berger and Hurst regarding the death penalty and the power of federal judges. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Professor William Gangi of St. John's University regarding the evaluation of Raoul Berger's text. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence from Hurst to Aida Donald of Harvard University Press regarding Raoul Berger's manuscript. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding the controversies surrounding Berger's Government by Judiciary. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding the fourteenth amendment and its relation to the bill of rights. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding Shapiro v. Thompson. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst and Raoul Berger regarding an article for the Washington Law Review. Correspondence
UW Law Digital Repository Resource
Correspondence between Hurst, Raoul Berger, and John P. Kaminski of the Center for the Study of the American Constitution regarding the framers and the constitution. Correspondence